The Benefits and Challenges of Group Discussion in Syntax Project
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the frame of qualitative research, this study aims to know the benefits and challenges of group discussion in Syntax project for students in EFL context in accomplishing Syntax project. The participants of this study consist of 25 students from the students of Syntax class in one of the higher educations in Kendari. The qualitative data were analyzed by questionnaire and students’ interview. The results of the research revealed that the students’ responded positively to the group discussion activity. It indicated this activity can improve students’ confidence and communication skills. Nevertheless, the students found it challenging in terms of the time allocation to finish the project as they cannot manage their time to finish the project well.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Baskoro. (2018). The Benefits of Group Discussion for Students’ Interpersonal Skills. 4(2018), 9–15.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2008). Using Discussion Pedagogy to Enhance Oral and Written Communication Skills. College Teaching, 56(3), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.56.3.163-172
Ellis, R. A., Calvo, R., Levy, D., & Tan, K. (2004). Learning through discussions. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000168504
Frank, M., Lavy, I., & Elata, D. (2003). Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic engineering course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026192113732
Garside, C. (1996). Look who’s talking: A comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills. Communication Education, 45(3), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529609379050
Hamann, K., Pollock, P. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2012). Assessing Student Perceptions of the Benefits of Discussions in Small-Group, Large-Class, and Online Learning Contexts. College Teaching, 60(2), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.633407
Hunkins, F. P., & Hammill, P. A. (1994). Beyond Tyler and Taba: Reconceptualizing the Curriculum Process. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(3), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619569409538774
Kvale, S. (2004). The psychoanalytical interview as inspiration for qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design., 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/10595-014
Lyon, D. C., & Lagowski, J. J. (2008). Effectiveness of facilitating small-group learning in large lecture classes. A general chemistry case study. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(11), 1571–1576. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p1571
Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000122297
O.Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M. (2005). Teaching and learning online: Assessing the effect of gender context on active learning. Journal of Political Science Education, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160490921815